🔗 Share this article

An activist organization has claimed to have harvested millions of tracks from the popular streaming service and is getting ready to release them online.

Possible Impetus for Artificial Intelligence Development

Observers said the seeming data breach could aid AI companies looking for data to develop their models.

A group called Anna’s Archive reported it had scraped 86 million music files from the platform and 256 million rows of associated data such as performer and album names. Spotify, which hosts more than 100 million songs, stated that the leak did not constitute its entire catalog.

“We have located and deactivated the nefarious user accounts that engaged in unlawful scraping,” said a Spotify spokesperson.

The Swedish company, which has more than 700 million users worldwide, further explained that an inquiry into unauthorised access identified a external actor scraped public metadata and used questionable tactics to circumvent DRM [digital rights management].

Group's Stated Goal and Worries

The streaming service does not think the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for providing links to copyright-infringing books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

They asserted the music files accounted for 99.6% of all music listened to by its listeners and would be distributed via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a method of exchanging large data files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic start,” commented Anna’s Archive, which describes its purpose as “safeguarding humanity’s knowledge and culture”.

Model Development and Copyright Battleground

A composer and campaigner for protecting artists’ rights, remarked the leaked music would probably be used for developing artificial intelligence systems.

“Training on illegally sourced data is unfortunately common in the tech sector, so this accessed music is almost certain to be used training AI models,” he said.

The group's website alludes to a large online archive, a vast online archive of copyrighted books that has reportedly been leveraged by Meta to develop its systems.

The co-founder of an AI startup posted on LinkedIn that individuals of the public could in theory “build their own private free version of Spotify”. The executive added it could also allow technology firms to “educate models on contemporary music at scale”.

Intellectual property law has become a battleground between creatives, writers and creatives on one side and tech giants on the other.

Government Considerations and Responses

Across Britain, artists and writers have raised concerns against a ministerial proposal to allow AI companies utilize copyright-protected work without permission unless the rights holder opts out. Virtually every participant to a government call for evidence on the idea has backed artists’ concerns.

The secretary of state for technology, innovation and development informed parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The government has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by March 2025.